Were you fired after requesting a reasonable workplace accommodation? Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Illinois Human Rights Act (IHRA), employees may be protected against unlawful disability discrimination and retaliation for requesting reasonable accommodations.
If your employer terminated, demoted, or otherwise penalized you after requesting an accommodation, you may have legal options.
Pinkston Law Group, P.C. represents Illinois employees facing wrongful termination, disability discrimination, and workplace retaliation.
Schedule a consultation with Attorney Danielle A. Pinkston to discuss your rights.
Call Our Office: (773) 770-4771
Fired After Requesting a Reasonable Accommodation? You May Have a Wrongful Termination Claim.
You informed your employer that you needed a workplace adjustment because of a disability or medical condition. You may have requested a modified schedule, additional breaks, medical leave, remote work, or specialized equipment.
Instead of considering your request, your employer fired you.
Perhaps your supervisor suddenly questioned your performance, human resources stopped responding to your emails, or management claimed your position was eliminated shortly after you requested an accommodation.
If you were fired after requesting a reasonable accommodation in Illinois, your termination may violate federal or state employment discrimination laws.
At Pinkston Law Group, P.C., Attorney Danielle A. Pinkston represents employees throughout Chicago and Illinois in disputes involving disability discrimination, ADA violations, workplace retaliation, and wrongful termination.
Our firm evaluates whether employers have violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Illinois Human Rights Act (IHRA), or other applicable employment laws.
If you believe your employer terminated you because you requested a disability-related accommodation, you may have legal options.
Call (773) 770-4771 to Schedule an Employment Law Consultation.
An employer generally cannot lawfully terminate an employee because the employee requested an accommodation protected by the ADA.
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, covered employers must provide reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities unless doing so would impose an undue hardship.
The ADA also prohibits retaliation for qualifying protected activity, including requesting a reasonable accommodation.
For example, an employee may request a modified work schedule because of a disability. Shortly afterward, management terminates the employee and claims the employee is no longer a good fit.
Depending on the evidence, the termination may support a claim for disability discrimination or retaliation.
Employees who believe they were unlawfully terminated may benefit from speaking with a Chicago Wrongful Termination Attorney.
However, requesting an accommodation does not automatically prevent an employer from taking otherwise lawful disciplinary or employment actions. The employee must establish the applicable elements of a legal claim.
A reasonable accommodation is a workplace adjustment that allows a qualified employee with a disability to perform essential job functions or enjoy equal employment opportunities.
Examples may include:
Employers are not necessarily required to provide an employee’s preferred accommodation if another effective accommodation is available.
For more information about workplace adjustments, visit our ADA Reasonable Accommodations page.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s reasonable accommodation guidance explains employers’ obligations under federal law.
The ADA prohibits covered employers from discriminating against qualified individuals on the basis of disability.
Under 42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(5)(A), unlawful discrimination includes failing to provide reasonable accommodations to known disability-related limitations unless the employer establishes undue hardship.
The ADA also prohibits unlawful retaliation and interference with protected rights.
Employees who believe they were fired because of a disability may have a claim for Disability Discrimination Through Termination.
The Illinois Human Rights Act, 775 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq., prohibits disability discrimination in covered employment relationships and provides protections concerning reasonable accommodations.
Illinois law may cover employment situations that differ from federal ADA coverage.
The Illinois Department of Human Rights administers discrimination protections under state law.
Our Chicago Disability Discrimination Attorney page provides additional information about disability-related workplace rights.
The FMLA may provide eligible employees with job-protected leave for qualifying serious health conditions.
When an accommodation request involves medical leave, an employee may have rights under both the ADA and FMLA.
Employees who are terminated after exercising qualifying medical leave rights may have claims involving FMLA Retaliation or interference.
The U.S. Department of Labor provides additional information about federal family and medical leave protections.
Yes. Requesting a reasonable accommodation is generally protected activity under the ADA’s anti-retaliation provisions.
An employer may not lawfully punish an employee because the employee requested an accommodation protected by law.
Examples of potentially unlawful retaliation include:
For example, an employee with a qualifying disability may request additional breaks. After the request, the employer begins issuing disciplinary warnings for conduct previously accepted.
Depending on the evidence, those actions may support an ADA retaliation claim.
Learn more about related protections on our Workplace Retaliation Attorney page.
The EEOC’s retaliation guidance explains how federal retaliation and interference protections operate.
An employer cannot lawfully terminate an employee because the employee requested a schedule accommodation protected by the ADA.
Modified work schedules may be reasonable accommodations depending on the employee’s limitations and the essential functions of the position.
For example, an employee undergoing medical treatment may request a later starting time.
Rather than evaluating the request, management may immediately terminate the employee for alleged attendance problems.
The circumstances may support a claim if the termination was discriminatory or retaliatory, or if the employer failed to provide an accommodation required by law.
However, employers may establish that a proposed schedule modification is ineffective or would impose undue hardship.
Remote work may qualify as a reasonable accommodation when an employee can perform essential job functions remotely and the arrangement is otherwise reasonable.
An employer must evaluate the request under the applicable legal requirements.
Relevant considerations include:
An employer does not automatically violate the ADA by denying remote work.
However, termination based on discriminatory assumptions about an employee’s disability or retaliation for requesting accommodation may violate the law.
An employee may be entitled to medical leave as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA.
For example, an employee recovering from surgery may request a finite period of leave before returning to work.
Depending on the circumstances, the employer may need to evaluate whether the leave is reasonable and whether it would impose undue hardship.
Employees may also qualify for protected leave under the FMLA.
If your employer terminated you because you requested or used qualifying leave, review our pages on Medical Leave Discrimination and Disability-Related Leave Requests.
Employees facing disputes after returning from leave may also have claims involving Return-to-Work Accommodation Disputes.
The interactive process involves communication between an employer and employee to identify potentially effective reasonable accommodations.
The process may include:
For example, an employee may request a modified schedule because of ongoing treatment.
Instead of discussing possible adjustments, the employer may reject the request without meaningful consideration.
If a reasonable accommodation was available and unlawfully denied, the employer may face liability.
Our Failure to Accommodate a Disability page addresses these claims in greater detail.
You can also learn about the employer’s responsibilities on our Interactive Process & Disability Accommodations page.
Under federal law, a breakdown in the interactive process generally must be connected to the denial of an accommodation that the employer was legally required to provide.
Termination immediately following an accommodation request may raise concerns about disability discrimination or retaliation.
For example:
An employee receives positive performance evaluations for several years.
The employee develops a qualifying disability and requests an accommodation.
Shortly afterward, management begins documenting alleged performance deficiencies and terminates the employee.
This sequence may provide relevant circumstantial evidence.
However, timing alone does not automatically establish unlawful termination.
Courts may also consider inconsistent explanations, discriminatory comments, comparator evidence, and other circumstances.
No.
Employees generally do not need to use specific legal terminology when requesting a reasonable accommodation.
An employee may say:
“I need to adjust my schedule because of medical treatment.”
Depending on the circumstances, that statement may be sufficient to notify the employer of a disability-related accommodation request.
However, merely mentioning a medical condition does not always establish that an accommodation was requested.
The EEOC’s guidance on requesting reasonable accommodations addresses the notice requirements.
Sometimes.
If the disability or need for accommodation is not obvious, an employer may request reasonable documentation sufficient to establish the disability and accommodation need.
However, the employer’s inquiries must comply with applicable restrictions on disability-related medical information.
An employer generally cannot demand unlimited medical records simply because an employee requested an accommodation.
The timing may support an inference of retaliation when considered with other evidence.
Management rejected the request without adequately evaluating available options.
Positive evaluations were followed by unexpected criticism after your accommodation request.
Management gave changing reasons for terminating your employment.
Discriminatory statements may provide evidence of unlawful motivation.
Comparable employees were treated differently under relevant circumstances.
A reasonable accommodation may have been available, but the employer failed to provide it.
These warning signs may justify legal investigation but do not independently establish liability.
The legal elements depend on whether the employee asserts disability discrimination, retaliation, failure to accommodate, or another claim.
Relevant evidence may include:
An employee may have more than one claim arising from the same events.
If you were fired after requesting a reasonable accommodation, preserve:
Preserve documents you are legally entitled to retain.
Depending on the statute and circumstances, remedies may include:
Back Pay: Lost wages and employment benefits caused by unlawful termination.
Front Pay: Future lost earnings when reinstatement is not appropriate.
Reinstatement: Restoration to employment when legally available.
Compensatory Damages: Compensation for qualifying emotional distress or other legally recognized harm.
Punitive Damages: Available in certain qualifying federal discrimination or retaliation claims, subject to statutory requirements.
Attorney’s Fees and Costs: Recoverable when authorized by applicable law.
Available remedies differ by cause of action, and federal statutory damages caps may apply.
Filing deadlines are important.
Employees in Illinois generally must file a discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission within 300 days of the alleged unlawful employment action, subject to applicable rules.
After receiving a Notice of Right to Sue, employees generally have 90 days to file a federal lawsuit.
See the EEOC’s charge-filing information.
For most covered employment discrimination claims under the current rules, employees generally have two years from the alleged violation to file a charge with the Illinois Department of Human Rights.
See the Illinois Department of Human Rights charge process.
FMLA claims generally have a two-year limitations period, extended to three years for willful violations.
The applicable deadline depends on the claim and facts.
Employees should not assume that Illinois’ longer administrative deadline extends the federal EEOC filing period.
Potentially.
An employee terminated after requesting an accommodation may have claims involving:
Each cause of action has distinct legal elements and requirements.
If you believe your termination was unlawful:
Pinkston Law Group, P.C. represents Illinois employees in disability discrimination, reasonable accommodation, workplace retaliation, and wrongful termination matters.
Attorney Danielle A. Pinkston evaluates claims involving:
Our firm represents employees throughout Chicago, Cook County, Will County, DuPage County, Kane County, and surrounding Illinois communities.
If your employer fired you after you requested a reasonable accommodation, you may have legal rights under the ADA, Illinois Human Rights Act, or other applicable laws.
Do not wait until the filing deadline approaches to evaluate your claim.
Pinkston Law Group, P.C.
Attorney Danielle A. Pinkston
30 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1004
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Phone: (773) 770-4771
Schedule an Employment Law Consultation Today.
Advertising Material. This page provides general educational information and does not constitute legal advice. Viewing this information does not create an attorney-client relationship. Legal outcomes depend on the facts and applicable law.

Whether you’re dealing with a family law, civil rights violation, or a personal injury case, you and your family’s best interests are our top priority. Attorney Danielle A. Pinkston of Pinkston Law Group utilizes her extensive legal knowledge to resolve your case, no matter how complex it may be. We share your goals and work closely with you, delivering the exceptional services you need.
Injury lawyer who is ready to help those who have suffered as a result of an auto crash or other personal injury.
A skilled matrimonial and family law attorney ready to vigorously advocate for you.
Aggressive and dedicated civil rights attorney helping individuals get the justice they deserve.