Chicago Workplace Retaliation Attorney Protecting Employees Who Report Discrimination
You reported discrimination because you believed your employer was treating you or another employee unlawfully. Instead of addressing your concerns, your employer began treating you differently.
Perhaps you received your first negative performance evaluation. You were placed on a performance improvement plan (PIP), denied a promotion, transferred to an undesirable position, or terminated shortly after complaining to human resources.
If your employer punished you because you engaged in legally protected activity involving workplace discrimination, you may have a retaliation claim.
At Pinkston Law Group, P.C., Attorney Danielle A. Pinkston represents employees throughout Chicago and Illinois in employment discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination matters.
Our firm helps employees understand their rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Illinois Human Rights Act, and other applicable employment laws.
Reporting workplace discrimination should not cost you your career.
Schedule an Employment Law Consultation or call (773) 770-4771.
Workplace retaliation occurs when an employer takes action prohibited by law because an employee engaged in legally protected activity.
Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Illinois Human Rights Act, qualifying employees have protections against retaliation for opposing unlawful employment discrimination or participating in covered discrimination proceedings.
Protected complaints may concern discrimination based on:
For example, an employee may complain that Black employees receive harsher discipline than similarly situated white employees.
If the employer subsequently punishes the employee because of that protected complaint, a retaliation claim may arise.
For broader information about workplace rights, visit our Chicago Workplace Retaliation Attorney page.
An employer generally cannot lawfully retaliate against an employee for making an internal complaint that qualifies as protected opposition to unlawful discrimination.
Protected conduct may include:
However, not every complaint about unfair treatment qualifies as protected activity.
For example, complaining that a supervisor is rude does not necessarily constitute protected opposition unless the complaint concerns conduct prohibited by applicable discrimination laws.
Learn more about workplace discrimination in Chicago and Illinois.
Retaliation does not always involve losing your job.
Depending on the circumstances, prohibited retaliation may include:
An employee reports race discrimination and is terminated shortly afterward.
The employer claims poor performance, but the employee previously received favorable evaluations.
If the evidence establishes that the protected complaint caused the termination under the applicable legal standard, the employee may have a retaliation claim.
Read more about wrongful termination based on retaliation.
An employee complains about discrimination and is suddenly placed on a performance improvement plan.
A PIP is not automatically unlawful. However, a retaliatory PIP may support a claim when it satisfies the governing legal requirements.
Relevant evidence may include previous performance evaluations, inaccurate allegations, inconsistent expectations, and departures from normal disciplinary procedures.
An employee reports sexual harassment and is subsequently removed from a supervisory position because of the complaint.
A retaliatory demotion may violate applicable employment discrimination laws.
An employee complains about discriminatory scheduling and then experiences a substantial reduction in weekly hours.
If the reduction was caused by protected activity and satisfies the applicable legal standard, it may constitute unlawful retaliation.
An employee supports a coworker’s discrimination complaint and is denied a promotion because of that participation.
The employee may have a retaliation claim even if the underlying discrimination complaint was unsuccessful.
An employer transfers an employee to a substantially less desirable assignment because the employee reported discrimination.
A retaliatory transfer may be actionable depending on the circumstances.
A supervisor threatens an employee with termination or professional consequences for making a protected discrimination complaint.
Such threats may constitute retaliation when the applicable legal requirements are met.
An employer generally cannot lawfully terminate an employee because the employee engaged in protected opposition to race discrimination or participated in a covered discrimination proceeding.
For example, an employee may report that Black employees are repeatedly denied promotions despite having qualifications comparable to those of white employees.
Following the complaint, the employee begins receiving disciplinary warnings and is eventually terminated.
The timing, employer’s explanation, and treatment of similarly situated employees may be relevant evidence.
Our Workplace Discrimination Attorney page explains additional protections involving discriminatory employment practices.
Potentially.
An employee may have a retaliation claim even if the original discrimination allegation is not ultimately established.
Employees who reasonably and in good faith oppose conduct they believe violates applicable discrimination laws may receive protection.
Participation in covered EEOC proceedings receives particularly broad protection.
The EEOC’s retaliation enforcement guidance explains these protections.
However, filing a discrimination complaint does not automatically prevent an employer from taking legitimate employment action for unrelated reasons.
A retaliation claim commonly involves evidence of three issues.
You engaged in conduct protected by applicable employment discrimination law.
Evidence may include written complaints, emails, text messages, EEOC charges, IDHR charges, or witness testimony.
Under Title VII, an employer’s action may be materially adverse if it could dissuade a reasonable worker from making or supporting a discrimination complaint.
Examples may include termination, demotion, substantial reductions in hours, or other materially adverse conduct.
The employer took the challenged action because of protected activity, under the applicable legal standard.
Evidence may include:
Timing alone does not necessarily establish retaliation.
An employer may lawfully place an employee on a performance improvement plan for legitimate reasons.
However, a PIP may support a retaliation claim if it is imposed because of protected activity and meets the applicable legal standard.
Important questions include whether performance concerns existed before the complaint, whether the PIP contains accurate information, and whether the employer applied its policies consistently.
An attorney may review the employee’s performance history, complaint records, and disciplinary documentation to evaluate the circumstances.
Employment retaliation claims may involve strict filing deadlines.
For many Title VII retaliation claims in Illinois, employees generally must file an EEOC charge within 300 calendar days of the challenged employment action.
Review the EEOC Chicago filing deadline information.
For covered Illinois Human Rights Act employment claims involving incidents on or after January 1, 2025, the IDHR generally provides a two-year filing period.
Review the Illinois Department of Human Rights charge process.
Different statutes and circumstances may involve different deadlines.
An internal HR investigation generally does not stop an administrative filing deadline.
Depending on the statute and circumstances, available remedies may include:
Not every remedy is available under every statute, and some claims are subject to damages limitations.
If you believe your employer punished you for reporting discrimination:
You do not necessarily have to wait until you are terminated to consult an employment attorney.
At Pinkston Law Group, P.C., Attorney Danielle A. Pinkston represents employees in disputes involving workplace retaliation, discrimination, wrongful termination, and other employment law violations.
Our firm evaluates discrimination complaints, disciplinary records, performance evaluations, employer communications, and potential evidence of retaliatory motivation.
We recognize that reporting discrimination may create difficult decisions concerning employment, income, and professional opportunities.
Our goal is to help employees understand their rights and pursue appropriate legal remedies supported by the evidence.
An employer generally cannot lawfully terminate an employee because of protected opposition to unlawful discrimination.
Potentially. Demotion, reduced hours, threats, and other materially adverse actions may support a claim.
Not necessarily. Oral complaints may qualify as protected activity, depending on the circumstances.
Certain opposition and participation activities involving coworkers’ discrimination complaints are protected.
A legitimate PIP is not automatically unlawful, but a retaliatory PIP may support a claim.
Potentially. The original complaint does not necessarily have to succeed for retaliation protections to apply.
Potentially. Termination is not required for every retaliation claim.
Many federal EEOC charges in Illinois have a 300-day deadline. Covered IDHR employment claims involving incidents on or after January 1, 2025 generally have a two-year deadline.
Were you fired, demoted, disciplined, or punished after reporting workplace discrimination?
You may have rights under Title VII, the Illinois Human Rights Act, or other applicable employment laws.
Attorney Danielle A. Pinkston represents employees throughout Chicago and Illinois in employment discrimination and retaliation matters.
Reporting discrimination should not cost you your career.
Pinkston Law Group, P.C.
Attorney Danielle A. Pinkston
30 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 1004
Chicago, IL 60602
Phone: (773) 770-4771
Schedule Your Employment Law Consultation
Advertising Material. This page provides general educational information and does not constitute legal advice. Viewing this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Whether you’re dealing with a family law, civil rights violation, or a personal injury case, you and your family’s best interests are our top priority. Attorney Danielle A. Pinkston of Pinkston Law Group utilizes her extensive legal knowledge to resolve your case, no matter how complex it may be. We share your goals and work closely with you, delivering the exceptional services you need.
Injury lawyer who is ready to help those who have suffered as a result of an auto crash or other personal injury.
A skilled matrimonial and family law attorney ready to vigorously advocate for you.
Aggressive and dedicated civil rights attorney helping individuals get the justice they deserve.