Employees who request or take protected leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) may be protected against unlawful workplace retaliation. Employers may violate federal law by firing, demoting, disciplining, reducing hours, denying promotions, or otherwise taking adverse employment actions against employees because they exercised or attempted to exercise their FMLA rights. Retaliation may occur during medical leave, after an employee returns to work, or following a request for protected family or medical leave.
At Pinkston Law Group, P.C., we represent employees throughout Chicago and Illinois who have experienced FMLA retaliation, wrongful termination after medical leave, workplace discrimination, or other adverse employment actions related to protected leave.
Were you fired, demoted, disciplined, or treated unfairly after requesting or taking FMLA leave? You may have an FMLA retaliation claim. Call (773) 770-4771 to schedule a consultation with a Chicago FMLA retaliation attorney.
Taking time away from work to recover from a serious medical condition or care for a family member should not cost you your career. Under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), eligible employees of covered employers have important protections against unlawful retaliation for exercising their medical and family leave rights.
If your employer fired you after FMLA leave, reduced your hours, denied a promotion, issued disciplinary warnings, or otherwise penalized you because of protected leave, you may have grounds for an FMLA retaliation claim in Illinois.
At Pinkston Law Group, P.C., Chicago employment attorney Danielle A. Pinkston represents employees facing FMLA retaliation, wrongful termination, medical leave discrimination, and other unlawful workplace practices.
Our firm represents employees throughout Chicago, Cook County, and surrounding Illinois communities.
Schedule Your Employment Law Consultation
Call (773) 770-4771 to discuss your rights.
Learn more about our Chicago Employment Law Practice and FMLA & Medical Leave Legal Services.
FMLA retaliation occurs when an employer takes prohibited action against an employee because the employee exercised or attempted to exercise protected rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act or engaged in other activity protected by the statute.
The FMLA protects qualifying employees who need leave for certain medical and family circumstances.
Under 29 U.S.C. § 2615, employers are prohibited from interfering with FMLA rights and discriminating against individuals for opposing practices made unlawful by the Act.
Federal regulations also prohibit employers from using FMLA leave as a negative factor in employment decisions.
See 29 C.F.R. § 825.220.
Examples of potential FMLA retaliation in Illinois include:
Not every unfavorable employment decision following medical leave is unlawful. The applicable legal standards, employer’s explanation, and available evidence determine whether an employee has a viable claim.
Employees experiencing adverse treatment may also benefit from reviewing our Chicago Workplace Retaliation Attorney page.
An employer generally cannot lawfully terminate an employee because the employee exercised protected FMLA rights.
However, the FMLA does not guarantee employment regardless of circumstances. An employer may still terminate an employee for a legitimate reason unrelated to protected leave.
For example, an employee who has consistently received positive performance evaluations may request FMLA leave for surgery. Shortly after returning, the employee receives unexpected disciplinary warnings and is terminated.
Those circumstances may warrant an investigation into whether the employer’s stated reason was genuine or whether the termination was connected to protected medical leave.
Potential warning signs include:
If you were fired following medical leave, read our Wrongful Termination After Medical Leave in Illinois service page.
You can also learn about related claims on our Chicago Wrongful Termination Attorney page.
An employer may violate the FMLA by terminating an employee because the employee requested or took protected leave.
An employee’s termination immediately after medical leave does not automatically prove retaliation. However, timing combined with other evidence may support a claim.
Relevant evidence may include statements by supervisors, changes in performance assessments, and inconsistent treatment of employees.
Our firm evaluates these circumstances as part of its wrongful termination representation in Chicago.
Employees returning from qualifying FMLA leave generally have a right to restoration to the same or an equivalent position, subject to statutory exceptions.
An employer may violate the FMLA by demoting an employee because the employee exercised protected leave rights.
Under 29 U.S.C. § 2614, qualifying employees generally have job restoration protections.
A demotion may involve reduced compensation, diminished responsibilities, or loss of employment opportunities.
Some employees return from protected leave and suddenly receive unfavorable performance evaluations despite previously satisfactory work.
A negative review may be relevant evidence of retaliation when it improperly penalizes protected leave or contributes to an actionable employment decision.
An employee should preserve previous performance evaluations, written feedback, and communications concerning the challenged review.
An employer may violate FMLA protections by reducing an employee’s hours or compensation because the employee exercised protected leave rights.
For example, an employee who previously worked a full-time schedule may return from FMLA leave and be assigned substantially fewer hours because the employer resents the employee’s absences.
Whether this conduct is unlawful depends on the facts, applicable restoration requirements, and evidence of the employer’s reasons.
Employers generally cannot count protected FMLA leave as attendance violations or use qualifying leave as a negative factor in employment decisions.
For example, an employer may improperly assign attendance points for approved FMLA absences and later rely on those points to justify discipline.
The U.S. Department of Labor’s FMLA guidance provides additional information about protected leave rights.
Employees may also have legal protections when they oppose conduct prohibited by the FMLA or participate in protected FMLA-related proceedings.
An employer cannot lawfully punish an employee for activity protected under the applicable anti-retaliation provisions.
Our Workplace Retaliation Attorney page explains additional employment retaliation protections.
Employees often confuse FMLA interference with FMLA retaliation.
Although the claims can arise from the same circumstances, they address different legal issues.
FMLA interference generally involves an employer improperly denying, restraining, or interfering with an employee’s exercise or attempted exercise of protected leave rights.
Examples may include:
FMLA retaliation involves prohibited adverse treatment connected to protected FMLA activity.
Examples may include:
The precise legal framework depends on the facts and controlling law. Some employment actions involving the use of leave may also be analyzed under an interference theory.
Our Chicago FMLA & Medical Leave Attorney page explains both types of claims.
An employee pursuing an FMLA retaliation lawsuit in Chicago must establish the elements required under the applicable legal theory.
Depending on the circumstances, relevant issues may include:
Courts may evaluate both direct and circumstantial evidence.
Relevant evidence may include:
Employees should preserve only documents and information they are legally authorized to access or possess.
An experienced Chicago FMLA retaliation attorney can review available evidence and evaluate whether additional information should be obtained through appropriate legal procedures.
An employee may be protected when attempting to exercise FMLA rights, including requesting qualifying leave.
For example, an employer’s decision to terminate an eligible employee because the employee requested protected medical leave may violate federal law even if the leave never began.
Whether a request qualifies for protection depends on the employee’s eligibility, the information provided, and other statutory requirements.
For additional information, review the U.S. Department of Labor’s FMLA Frequently Asked Questions.
Eligible employees may qualify for intermittent FMLA leave or a reduced work schedule when medically necessary or otherwise permitted by law.
Intermittent leave may be appropriate for:
Employers generally cannot lawfully penalize employees merely for using properly protected intermittent FMLA leave.
However, employees must satisfy applicable notice, certification, and other requirements.
An employer may argue that termination resulted from poor performance, misconduct, or attendance issues rather than protected medical leave.
An FMLA retaliation claim may require examining whether the stated explanation was genuine.
Relevant considerations may include:
A legitimate performance-based termination may be lawful. However, an employer cannot use a false explanation to conceal unlawful retaliation.
Employees who believe they were fired for an unlawful reason may also review our Wrongful Termination Legal Services.
The FMLA generally provides eligible employees with up to 12 workweeks of protected leave during the applicable 12-month period, subject to special rules.
After FMLA leave is exhausted, employees may have additional protections under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or the Illinois Human Rights Act.
In appropriate circumstances, a finite period of additional leave may qualify as a reasonable accommodation, subject to the applicable legal standards and defenses.
Employers are not automatically required to provide unlimited leave.
Pinkston Law Group represents employees in related disputes involving:
Employees can also review the EEOC’s reasonable accommodation guidance.
Depending on the applicable claim and evidence, remedies under 29 U.S.C. § 2617 may include:
Emotional distress damages and punitive damages generally are not available under the FMLA itself.
Other employment laws may provide different remedies when their separate legal requirements are satisfied.
The FMLA generally provides a two-year statute of limitations for filing a civil action.
For willful violations, the limitations period may extend to three years.
See 29 U.S.C. § 2617(c).
Employees generally do not need to file an EEOC charge before bringing an FMLA lawsuit.
However, related claims under the ADA or other employment discrimination laws may have separate administrative requirements and filing deadlines.
Because multiple legal deadlines may apply to the same employment dispute, employees should seek legal advice promptly.
Pinkston Law Group, P.C. is a Chicago law firm representing employees in employment disputes involving wrongful termination, workplace retaliation, discrimination, and protected medical leave.
Founded in 2010, our firm provides individualized legal representation and evaluates each client’s circumstances to identify potentially applicable legal protections.
Attorney Danielle A. Pinkston represents employees in matters involving:
Our firm understands that workplace retaliation can affect an employee’s income, healthcare, professional reputation, and financial stability.
We serve clients in Chicago and throughout Illinois, including Cook County, Will County, DuPage County, and Kane County.
Learn more about our Employment Law Practice.
An employer cannot lawfully terminate an employee because the employee engaged in protected FMLA activity. However, legitimate employment decisions unrelated to leave may still occur.
Potentially. Employees may pursue claims when the evidence establishes a violation under the applicable FMLA legal standards.
An employer generally cannot demote an employee because the employee exercised protected FMLA rights. Applicable restoration rules and exceptions must also be considered.
An employer may evaluate legitimate performance concerns but cannot unlawfully penalize an employee for protected FMLA activity.
Yes. Other legally actionable employment decisions may support an FMLA claim, depending on the circumstances.
A genuine position elimination may be lawful. However, an employer cannot use a claimed restructuring as a pretext for unlawful retaliation.
Employers generally cannot assign disciplinary consequences to properly protected FMLA absences or use protected leave as a negative factor in employment decisions.
There is no standard settlement amount. Potential recovery depends on the evidence, financial losses, available statutory remedies, and applicable legal limitations.
Generally, no. However, related claims under other employment discrimination laws may require administrative exhaustion.
Were you fired, demoted, disciplined, or otherwise punished after requesting or taking protected FMLA leave?
You may have legal options under federal employment law.
At Pinkston Law Group, P.C., Attorney Danielle A. Pinkston represents employees throughout Chicago and Illinois in disputes involving FMLA retaliation, medical leave discrimination, and wrongful termination.
Schedule Your Employment Law Consultation Today
Pinkston Law Group, P.C.
30 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1004
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Call (773) 770-4771
Advertising Material. This page provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice. The outcome of any employment claim depends on its facts and applicable law.

Whether you’re dealing with a family law, civil rights violation, or a personal injury case, you and your family’s best interests are our top priority. Attorney Danielle A. Pinkston of Pinkston Law Group utilizes her extensive legal knowledge to resolve your case, no matter how complex it may be. We share your goals and work closely with you, delivering the exceptional services you need.
Injury lawyer who is ready to help those who have suffered as a result of an auto crash or other personal injury.
A skilled matrimonial and family law attorney ready to vigorously advocate for you.
Aggressive and dedicated civil rights attorney helping individuals get the justice they deserve.